Slash Segue

Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.

*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor

---

For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?

**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"

*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]

Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)

[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]

It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.

Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.

footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]

[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.

[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]

1-9-14 Kant we all  ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches?  No.  Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics?  Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant.  Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics.  Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee.  (G'Ribble Label?)

FOOTNOTE THREE (1-3-13)

JAN 2012 FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE

1-3-13 "me me" =(b.s.) or blog search scroll over
1-14-13 nor read or go all [!]
1-16-13 Loveland (NPR) and Colorado/Phoeniz-Sedona

Until I update some techno roots I am limited to photos already in my blogspot files.

The Square Root of

[" i. "]

This ... is not being facetious or Freudian.  But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*




BTW:  NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive








Co-wink Key-dink ?  D'oh!




(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)

1.  the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2.  Chesterton on importance of fables
3.  ditto
4.  semantic (bs)/bs
5.  Mobius
Notational  Segway [!] *



*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you

Low4est

As opposed to Hi8us or A3?

a1.  My roots are Scandinavian, French, 'n French-Canadian.
a2.  I won't get into my branches or algorithms.
b4. I tan gent or share 'n angle, my primary school was Sherwood Forest. 
c4. Presage of King County.
Sea 1st link.

The missing link?
[The spin* or ge oh me tricks of logos. {re-image} Politics, Economics, Hume...or us.]

* link added 4-13-14 (de-image) #- / -[!]
[4-14-14: ?   Objective Good ? ! ]
[Hume or ...  ?]
4-15-14 [Hume or?]

Going out on a limb here.

And hoping other branches catch me.
It is all political.

The FISA deal is not as bad as it could be.

I have not dug into the roots too deep, but if there is FISA review for programs, it is a new leaf on a branch. But as far as the immunity go, the three branches of government, are all unprecedentedly political.

Immunity may be retroactive, but review and accountability are still unprecedented.
It is not the corporations that we need to worry about prosecuting in these cases, it is their cooperation. As the tree branches grow, things change, and retro-activity could be cut off or not matter unprecedentedly.

[6-30-08 Olbermann/Dean?]

Marco...

Polo
Time Machine?
Marco Rubio.

A bit of an astroturf here, not the grass* roots:

Several times during his race for U.S. Senate, Rubio told reporters and voters his parents left Cuba in 1959, suggesting they had fled Castro's rule. In his campaign biography, and later in his official Senate biography, he said his parents "came to America following Fidel Castro's takeover."

It turns out that: "Instead of fleeing Castro's Cuba, the Rubios came to the United States for "economic opportunity," Conant said."
* next

Vast Mainstream Conspiracy (VMC)

= HYPE!
I was actually[***] on the way to another link when the imperfect nature of things took a tangent to the Montel Williams comment above (HYPE!).

Hype* was already[**] on my mind, as the nature of the beast. Media in general not The Daily Ones.

* see bracketed by Remembering posts
** see comment 1 Also see bold roots(links/cheer)

*** [Subliminal Root or Cheer and/or (ofor) Market Forces in balance and action?]

Evangelical Pap?

The Pap Attack
The Roots of the Sermon

The Daily Left March 13th 2008
TruthOut Olbermann on Ferraro Clinton Flap Right On!

And Rachel Maddow
[ & 3EB I don't know where I am going here. But I will update Olbermann (3-13-08) as he covers a bit of what I delved into here or skipped off the surface.

But for now here: Read and filed/posted 3-13-08 McClatchyStrange Ticket
Nobel Estimates
and Pre-followed up post: Will Durst on McVeepStakes not to mention RalphMcSpoiler ]

Tact and Tack

Keep the Change! This is a pin the tail on the rhetoric(of sorts). As Palin said we "can keep the change". Economically, that means they will have to pay something. Tact is another matter. (It is not we or you or they or us.) In this regard some follow-up is warranted. We can agree that America is an exceptional place, but it is still a concern about what exceptionalism means. In this I mean to point to the French connection between a Slate comment(one Geir Smith) and a historical reference. Further tact(& tack) is required...
[But to be blunt the word is Heritage that explains our nation, and we are free to acknowledge our roots in the words we choose, and it can always be taken wrong by some,] i.e. we say anyone is a "fill in blank"-American but it does not mean anyone has two birth places (requiring hyphe-nation is no better than dropping one in a melting pot.)

All Politics is Local

Between the League,
and the Base ***
the ivy and the grass roots.[**]
Not to mention* between Lincoln, FDR and two Teddys.

* One should wonder if Lincoln could be elected as a Repulican, let alone how to carry a schtick.

[Puget Sound Liberals]
[Northwest Progress Institute]
[**] 11-13-09 Not to be con descending by noting the links, but I was speaking to the Base and the League in reading into it the problems that I try to work out in this blog. So please, speak up to power, and let's get down to business. An aside: Russ Baker needs a look, uppity or not.

*** this link is a hit

Now Dat's...

what I am talkin' 'bout.
And I had not even found the latter link before I had this line. But the former link needs updating and post dating.

Here it is:

Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Post Inserted Rough ramble old style.(pen and paper)

NO LABEL (constitutionalist)
Dragnet: names are changed (no association)
Bubble Up(Still) Party
No Champagne, but trickledown of whine.
Private Corps./Adam Smith
History / Our foundation.
Guilt by association, innocent by No.
Social Darwinist[Fundamental wordist}
Free Association, Not a Force.
Free Willie? So who(said)dat?
Play the cards, dealer.

Post-Sub Title: Buddie to remain nameless,
can you (S)paradigm and Party Less.

[The above will stand alone, substantially as originated and linkless so to speak, and for others to Google or search(of blog) themselves.]

NOW FOR THE FOOTNOTES: Who Dat? Chuck Knox. The Saints were no cards but the Seahawks are no joke! Now I will not try to trace back the rest of my ramble, but it is what I had in mind. But I will make a further association. The party to remain nameless, was asked for a label for himself(Constitutionalist). While others may be Tea Party Republicans or Libertarian Free Marketeers, to label or not to label that is the question. Whether is is nobler in the minds... Regardless we can associate 3rd partiers that may or may not associate with a party as having common strains* if not roots.

Note: changed "changes" to changed in ref. to Dragnet line.

BTW: whatever happened to the Gatorade for Carrol? I guess that is for college. But it seams a crack at the changes or no whine team. But in regards to the whine, I know parties that did not think a losing teams should go to the playoffs, but it is the way the rules were made. It is the process that matters whether you like it or not. Results of course matter, but you can't always change them.

*strains: on another thread elsewhere

Hierarchy of Hypocrisy

Hating to generalize I note my potential logical fallacy in the following. Nevertheless, between the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment, there seems a hierarchy for some. From Right to Bear Arms to Citizenship Rights where does the 1st amendment fit in? (*)

A. There is no hierarchy in constitutional amendments.
B. There are Supreme Court rulings that influence their dynamics.
C. So many blogs are moot points. (GOTO 1st sentence)

Of course maybe my posts are just moot or problematic. Problematic in generalizing and leaping. Unfortunately you must read, to decide. In generalizing there may be some association between the authors of certain events but not necessarily relevant. In the above case I simply point to fact that removal of citizenship is being considered for some but not their guns, while free speech is an element that might be fringe but relative. Meanwhile in an earlier and adjacent thought, some of this new found legislative fury seem like WMD.** Weapons of Mass Distraction. It would seem that all this populist rancor is really keeping Homeland Securiy busy. And while I support all rights reasonably used, I cannot help but feel that it really is a burden on our security. A bit more responsible reporting and responsible associating might help, but then how one goes about that...almost makes me long for a unitary executive. BTW: the dot, dot, dot was a rhetorical segue or moot question.

My potential obtuseness was not an attempt to be excedingly careful***, yet the cause and effect might be anachronistic(i.e. flip-flopped). The links to previous word choices were not intentionally designed to be more than a search for my previous usage, but they do seem to bring up some previous associations which show the importance of the process and progress, not to mention providing hope.

(*) an alternative link.
(**) not that early: My first referencing of Weapon of Mass Distraction.
(***) but maybe an antidote to some talk show hosts that muddle the search for terrorist

[Oh, and I do not vouch for the legal analysis or terminology in my ABC's. And had not intended to close with the SCOTUS link when I set out. Let alone the less than inflammable association with security. But it does seem that it is wierd that flammable and moot have similar usage issues as does the roots or branches of Faust, let alone Devil's Advocates. But no, that is the legal process, not to mention political, and word and world modifying dynamics, or as I have stumbled out(or coined) "dymanics". I will conclude with the issue that there was some Beckian confusion in the topic of a National Prayer Day in regard to what was canceled and what is being fought and by whom. But the ideas which Thom Hartmann yesterday contrasted was a National Day of Reason to share and balance the National Day of Prayer. While I suggested a National Day of Faith. But would that be legal? Not without debate, moot and inflammable or not.]

Bleep 'n Compromise (Dept Ceiling) Review**

Not to be prophetic, but "I told you so."

In particular in The Jig is Up? and Bleep 'n Compromise,
but more importantly under Respected Sources.

IMHO: Randi Rhodes and Lawrence O'Donnell are radio and TV's number one(respectively) explainers* of the Obama Administration. Here are two Debt Ceiling recaps from Randi Rhodes which are nothing compared to hearing her.(AM 1090 Forum )

*respectfully
** which is not the same as bleepin'
(See Bleep & Compromise)

[Related Links and Nets or Roots & branches.]
[I wish I could unembed a little more plain language from this post, but maybe a counter example might do. With a do nothing congress***, the best thing to do is to kick the can down the road for political purposes.

*** or more accurately an undo-everything-House
edited (bold and spacing only)

[On the other hand: No Labels(slash)New Party
More musing: architect, archetype / archespectral, archiflightese]
[Speaking of hooks or hoofs? Read Herring?]


John Deering

What are they smoking?

Grass Roots v. Grass Fires.
(Astroturf: the new carpetbaggers)
(Swifter(out from) under the rug, or wet blanket. Should we
fly the flag?)*
[Who inhaled? (Dylan or Donnie and Joe?)]
[Sweep Tea Partiers under the Astroturf with Swifter-(see coupons above)]

[Olbermann: Terrorist Panels and...
Psssst. THEY DRUG OLD PEOPLE.
Rachel Maddow and the party of nope & rope a dope.]

* Boycott FOX and wave at Walmart and P&G for their agreement.

Now this is the ticket.

Or rather perspective on having a perspective.

1. Professor Ponzi, or thinking about the methodology, the sociology and the economics of economics

2. Sylvia Nasar on The Story of Economic Genius: Great Thinkers in History

New Page: Institute for New Economic Thinking

Also: Progressive Media

Also Updates: Gingrich/Romney on Pop e Culture.*

Such** a deal?

*the links are still evolving, I saw an impressive Romney speech***, but only in the light of Gingrich and Santorum.

** Thom Hartmann roots out biology and an abstraction as corner stone to society, before guestflees. (and that is a note on the light R side)

[BTW: these are living asterisks in their anachronism C*** BTW2.0 He opens with a spin on the joke on Bush. GW gave us progressives. To paraphrase: Obama community organized CPAC.]

*** also C***under-BTW: Pop Culture & yogurt or Yo!Gurt

under **see-not necessarily a huff

[On the Economy, and mythbusters?]

[2-23-12 The Dickens, you say? Label and Image added.]

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

(1864-1917) Humanism, How is "exactness" possible*?
(1775-1854) Transcendental Idealism
Newtonian venn?**

* I will do little more than indicate Schopenhauer's relation to Hegel under Runes, let alone Schlick.(The Construction of Theories)
** Hobbes Squaring the Circle pre-Newton/Liebniz.

Ribble? re: nacre?
Hint?

12-27-13 Hobbes (b.s.)^  and Schlick(wiki) links inserted.

^ A(2) ? genre fishing ? ! ?

Pre-Mod L? (1588-1679)(1642-1727)(1646-1716)  So there was some overlap. Hobbes was mocked for trying to square the circle pre-calculus or pre-hyperbolic geometry. ? ! (lost roots ! ? [a, b, c ] ) (spoiler alert => OW do not scroll)

Use of Labels

This is just a note that labels are not always useful.
[liberals, conservatives, progressives, neo-cons, communists, fascists]
However, LABELS as they are used below, may be helpful. The previous post includes the addition of the "label" ESCALATION but could be used for almost anything the administration does. At this time it places a focus on world powers and how they get along. The Geometry of Purpose? label refers basically to a structure of how to get things done. For example; focusing on one's own intentions from the grass roots up, not trickle down. Hence the Power Broker Mountain Project. This post is to explain some of the workings of this writer.

Trivium, for example represent the basic medieval course work at universities: grammar, logic and rhetoric. You can see where I am coming from and where we are going. Quadrivium is the upper division of the liberal arts composed of; arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.

Example of their use: Fuzzy Math and Fuzzy English = 1 heckuva result *

I will add to this post later, but another feature that I have just begun use of, is the search engine for the blog itself.(Just demonstrated click on heckuva) I will be inserting labels on previous posts, and clicking on them below will bring up that label's postings.

Bonus: LINK requires "Hard Work" of reading and more importantly filtering.

* in case more of a hint is needed, sometimes I am a hechuva speller as well.

Change Happens!

A New Kind of Pride Eugene Robinson Washington Post Even from my Norman* roots.

From a Rachel Maddowian perspective, I don't want to count my chickenhawks before they fly. But as you can tell by the time of this post the ground swell is a great feeling.

Maybe I won't call it till 1-20-09. Superstition being that as soon as a bet is placed the odds change. Actually that is a reality. Technically every vote should count. Statistically it takes us all. I don't know whatity,(or whatally) but it is rather late. The point is, I will not place a bet on the chance it jinxes or nixes our future.

[grab bag from my email]
[8:30 AM - Obama Elected President as Racial Barrier Falls Truthout.]
[I have to say the Republicans succesfully employed a strategy to get out the vote that I could not have implimented by myself. Make it tough to vote and the people will get it.]
[Looking forward from yesterday: Obama on Election Day. and last week regarding fears of one party rule.]

* Scandinavian, French, Mixed heritage

"if I were dictator"

Blair loses job. But as far as President of Europe, Blair
"...is increasingly willing to put himself forward for the job if it comes with real powers to intervene in defence and trade affairs."

As far as U.S. and a third party?
"The lesser of two evils...is still evil."

Yeah but, if the lesser is the loser, the greater evil wins. Therefore does it make sense that with Edwards out, and Nader supported Edwards, and with McCain in(?) and Ron Paul is against the war, that there be a Paul/Nader ticket?

Is there another kind of politics or reality?

I'll have to check and get back to you.

[Let me just say that having read 3 of the links here and part of the fourth, I am back to you. My reliance was mostly on the gist I presumed from a quick glance at the articles and maybe where I already wanted to go. I'm not disappointed in where it took me but the pieces are a bit heavy for my fare. In fact the last is a little bit romantic in a horror sort of way, which draws me back to another intersecting thought. The roots of Romanticism in literature being the French Revolution and its libertarianism and egalitarianism. I must also note the hope for goodness in humanity and the scepticism of rationality. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, The Modern Prometheus, comes to mind. A more balanced approach is what I would suggest. Meanwhile I finished another loose end or article not even in this loop. "We are the World" in The Nation takes a look at two books on our place in the world. How ironic that realism was offered as an opposite to the Zeitgist of ideas.]
[2-4-08: undated brackets are same day updates, here I footnote the two books that "We are the World" reviews. A Case for Goliath and A New Deal for the World. What a deal! And harkening back to Huntington's Clash of Civilizations. A word comes to mind: academic. Some are less than academic, but all can become academic, if we don't make the connections of the varied fields.]